This time I’ll be following the syllabus so it’s not such a huge mess, but still keep in mind “surface area to volume ratio”, “energy conservation” and “water conservation”.
1. Evidence of evolution suggests that the mechanisms of inheritance, accompanied by selection, allow change over many generations
OK. Read that again carefully. The key words this time are “evolution”, “inheritance” and “selection”. Maybe even evidence, but that’s not as important.
Now, 1st column 1st dot point:
Outline the impact on the evolution of plants and animals of: changes in physical conditions in the environment; changes in chemical conditions in the environment; competition for resources.
The directive term outline means to do a brief blog about it without excessive detail or specifics, so here it goes:
Changes in physical conditions in the environment have caused plants and animals that are better adapted to the new conditions will be naturally selected to survive and pass on their characteristics when they reproduce, thus impacting evolution by changing the dominant set of characteristics within the population. (You can just do a search and replace for chemical).
Increased competition for reasources will mean that natural selection will take place and favour the survival of those in the population with characterisitcs that can most efficiently acquire and utilise the available resources. (Insert the bit from above about how it = evolution).
Onto the 2nd column 1st dot point:
Plan, choose equipment or resources and perform a first-hand investigation to model natural selection
You should’ve written up your prac! >:(
Anyway, you have some pieces of paper with 3 different colours and you roll a biased dice X number of times to kill a member of the population. You then go to the reproduction step. Someone has to close their eyes and pick 2 pieces of paper at random. If both are the same colour, and it’s one of the “pure” breeds, then they will produce an offspring that is that colour. If it’s a hybrid + a pure, then you roll for a 1/2 chance (IIRC) of a hybrid and 1/2 chance of a pure. If it’s a hybrid + hybrid, you roll for a 1/4 chance each for a pure and 1/2 chance for a hybrid.
Basically, a certain “pure” colour had a higher chance of death (red, IIRC) because they were supposedly not adapted to the environment.
How will this be asked in the exam? No idea. Just looking through the 2008 paper, it didn’t seem to be there.
Next!
Analyse information from secondary sources to prepare a case study to show how an environmental change can lead to changes in a species
Now this is quite a long blog. Time to break it down by KEY WORDS.
Analyse: That’s sorta like comparing screenshots from encodes. You’ve got to note down and compare the information then make and write down your judgement.
Secondary Sources: Wikip- err… Text books, internet sites, lolscientificjournals, non-Wikipedia Encyclopedias.
Case Study: Take an example and blog down whatever you can about it.
Environmental Change/Chance in Species: In HOLY BRITTANIA they started the lolindustrial revolution, which meant that there’s volumetric fucktons of smoke everywhere, which meant that predators of moths would find it harder to, and hence not bother (unless they were trolls) to, kill the ones whose colour blended in with all that pollutantant. Due to that process of natural selection, more of those smoke-coloured moths survived and reproduced, therefore they become more dominant in the species, therefore there has been an overall change to smokier colours in the species.
Since Biology isn’t lolimpression marked, there’s no need to be original. The typical 99%-of-the-state case study will be fine.
Whew. That was much easier than the Eco case study.
describe, using specific examples, how the theory of evolution is supported by the following areas of study:
- WHATEVER
I doubt they’ll specifically ask for some pretentious obscure one, so we’ll just use the PENTADACTYL LIMB, since once again, there’s no marks for originality. Basically they’re in basically every man and his dog, even birds and fish-like mammals, etc. Each part is slightly modified such that it provides an adaptive advantage in the environment that they live. Example: birds have omega long fingers (phlanges if you want to be pretentious) for A+++++ feather coverage. Don’t forget, of course, to link back to how that = evolution (the usual crap about some trait become more dominant).
You can also say some crap about DNA hybridisation and how humans and apes and summoned beings evolved from the same ancestor.
Next!
Use available evidence to analyse, using a named example, how advances in technology have change scientific thinking about evolutionary relationships.
Oh right, the DNA hybridisation crap was meant to go here. Basically, they take DNA from 2 different species and heat it to over nine thousand kelvins so that the double helix un-whatevers, then they take a strand from each species and cool them together and see how well they bond, and they get a quantitative result. This totally radicalised thinking because it showed that humans were closer to primates than apes (or something).
Back to 1st column.
Explain how Darwin/Wallace’s theory of evolution by natural selection and isolation accounts for divergent evolution and convergent evolution
Divergent evolution means that from a common ancestor, the descendents become less and less alike one another with time because if a population is split and isolated, genes cannot flow, and as such, their evolution will be dependent wholly on the selection pressures in their particular respective environment, causing characteristics favourable in the particular environment to be passed on through the generations (and therefore = evolution, blah blah blah)
As for convergent, no idea. Need to check notes… Dongs. Not there. Need to check HSC Online. Here’s some copy pasta:
Convergent evolution occurs when two relatively unrelated species develop similar structures, physiology or behaviours in response to similar selective pressures from similar environments. For example, dolphins (mammals) and sharks (cartilaginous fish) have evolved a streamlined body shape and fins that enable them to move efficiently through their aquatic environment, yet they are only remotely related as vertebrates. Communal social behaviour has developed independently in ants, termites and bees.
OK. Onto the next section, because I’m SICK of this year 9/10 rehash junk.
2.Gregor Mendel’s experiments helped advance our knowledge of the inheritance of characteristics
Actually, I think we never got to this…
OK, back to maintaining a balance.
Our best friend, the enzyme:
Each type only does 1 think and they’re A++++++++++ good at it. They only do 1 thing, so that your body can micro around all the chemical reactions that are happening (ie. it can affect 1 particular thing by simply changing 1 particular enzyme without directly affecting other stuff).
How does it work?
It’s randomly shaped and the substrate fits exactly in it (lock and key) or it ALMOST fits exactly in, then once it tries to fit, it changes it’s shape a bit to MAKE it exactly fit (induced fit). TBH, the 2nd model is probably more correct, but we don’t care because the first one is easier.
How does various :stuff: affect enzyme activity?
- Temprature +++ = +++, until the point the enzyme gets borked (denatured) at which point it becomes instantly zerox
- pH. Pretty acidic = good for most enzymes. I’m sure there are exceptions, but most likely they’re just gonna give you a graph or something so you can read it right off for a free 1 or 2 marks
- Substrate concentration. Obviously if it’s got more stuff to do, it can do it faster until it reaches 100% CPU utilisation, then it doesn’t get any faster even if it does get more stuff to do.
- Errrr… Forgot the rest. Oh, according to HSC online, that is all. Great!
Now for homeostatis. That thing we all love to hate.
It works on the concept of NEGATIVE FEEDBACK which means that your body acts to oppose whatever change is happening. Eg. if your water levels are getting low, it tries to conserve water. If your energy is getting waste it, it tries to conserve it. (Yes, my magical answers are still relevant!)
You’ll most likely need an example, so I’ll use temperature since I can’t be assed remembering anything else. Basically when temp rises/drops, your fabulous hypothallamus detects the change, then it can send electro-chemical messages through your nervous system at approaching the speed of light, provided you don’t have cistic fibrosis or similar, to your various body parts to take actions to oppose the change. Eg. if you feel hot, you will subconsciously sweat, fan yourself, turn on the air conditioner if you can affort one, etc. If you feel cold, you will feel ever colder because your body directs the blood away from the surface of your skin to keep it’s insides warm. Your hair would also stand up (more noticable in some parts than others
) to trap air, which is a super A+++++++ heat insulator.
You may or may not need/want to know a model, so just think a thermostat. It’s limitations? It can’t adapt to :long term: variations.
Done. Next. Derp, can’t remember what’s next, gonna take a break. Blagging is tiring work.
————